Mont Vernon
Community
Profile
Report

Mont Vernon, New Hampshire
April 16 & 17, 1999

This report is also available in MS Word format (243K).


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgments1
Introduction2
Creating a Community Profile in Mont Vernon2
Agenda4
Friday Evening6
The Mosaic6
The Vision7
Mont Vernon History7
The Ten Components8
1.Effective Community Leadership: A Broader Definition9
2.Informed Citizen Participation: More Than Voter Turn-Out11
3.Intergroup Relations: Celebrating Diversity Within the Community13
4.Keeping Our Cultural Heritage Strong: Arts, Festivals and Celebrations16
5.Education and Social Services: Meeting our Citizens' Needs17
6.Community Infrastructure: The Basics that Serve Our Needs20
7.Natural Resources Base: Water, Energy and Materials22
8.Working Landscape: Village, Farm and Forest25
9.Economic Vitality: Stability through Diversity27
10.Local Business, Local Wealth: Re-Circulating Money Within the Community29
Saturday Morning: Key Issues31
1.Communication33
2.Community Culture34
3.Conservation and Recreation35
4.Capital Improvements36
5.Master Plan37
6.Commercial Creativity38
Saturday Afternoon: Project Selection41
1.Action Steps43
2.Master Plan43
3.Economic Development46
4.Recreational Field47
5.Inventory and Mapping Natural Resources48
6.Communication49
Conclusion50
Appendices:
Participants51

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The following people, businesses and organizations provided support for the Mont Vernon Community Profile. Thanks to all of them.

The Community Profile model was developed with the assistance of:

© Copyright by UNH Cooperative Extension and Antioch New England Institute of Antioch University, 1998. UNH Cooperative Extension and Antioch New England Institute of Antioch University are interested in furthering the use of the Community Profile process to build sustainable communities. Use of the Community Profile process is prohibited without written permission of UNH Cooperative Extension and Antioch New England Institute of Antioch University, 1998.


OVERVIEW OF COMMUNITY PROFILES

The Community Profile is a process by which communities take stock of where they are today and develop an action plan for how they want to operate in the future. Whether the issue is a quality school system, an air pollution problem, lack of adequate affordable housing or solid waste disposal, the need for effective problem-solving skills is the same. A community must have strong leaders, from all sectors, who are able to work together with informed involved citizens to reach agreement on issues. The Community Profile assists communities to develop their problem-solving ability. It is a self-evaluation tool that draws heavily on the collective wisdom of the participants and is not a test or a comparison between communities. It provides a method for citizens to affirm community strengths, identify concerns and problems, and then to help a community structure collaborative approaches to meet these challenges creatively, set directions for the future, and manage change.

The original Civic Profile emerged from the Governor's Commission on New Hampshire in the 21st Century as a process and a mechanism that communities could use to strengthen their civic infrastructure. The National Civic League, along with several university studies, identified those qualities that make a community work - that help communities plan for the future and survive such dramatic change as extreme population growth, plant shut-downs or military base closings.

In 1995, the League of Women Voters in the Upper Valley, working with UNH Cooperative Extension and UVM Cooperative Extension, identified ten key qualities that help a community to work well now and sustain its social, economic, and environmental health for the future. This is the model that was adopted by the University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension Profile and are the "tools" of the community self-assessment.

CREATING A COMMUNITY PROFILE IN MONT VERNON

The driving force for a Community Profile for the Town of Mont Vernon was based around the need to update the Master Plan. The key person for initiating the Community Profile was Elizabeth Cleveland. As the chairperson of the Mont Vernon Conservation Commission, she saw a need for a strong, updated Master Plan as being extremely important to the community.

On September 15, 1998 the Planning Board heard a presentation from Judith Bush from the UNH Cooperative Extension. She explained the process of the Community Profile to the Planning Board and members of Conservation Commission that were in attendance.

The Conservation Commission requested that the Planning Board pay for the facilitation fee and that the other expenses that would be incurred to promote the Community Profile, could be done from fund raising.

At this time a chairman to organize the event was also presented, giving reassurance that there was willingness in the community to proceed. Having heard of the results of several Community Profiles throughout the State of New Hampshire, the Planning Board praised the concept and the good that will undoubtedly come from the event. There was a small amount of discussion and fairly quick consensus to support the program.

Now the ball was in my court to put together a Steering Committee to promote and organize the event. On Election Day in November, I set up a table in the Village School to generate interest in a Community Profile. I advertised the first meeting as being on December 1st. The second meeting was on January 7th. By that second meeting a solid core of 10 volunteers had been established. The Steering Committee was now formed.

From the very beginning this committee showed a very strong interest in the success of this event. In communication with UNH Cooperative Extension, we established the third

weekend in April 1999 for the Mont Vernon Community Profile. What follows is the results of that Community Profile.

Respectively submitted,

Mike Fimbel, Chairperson

Mont Vernon Community Profile Steering Committee


UNH Cooperative Extension

Mont Vernon Community Profile

Mont Vernon Village School
April 16 & 17, 1999

Agenda

Friday Evening
6:00Sign-In & Supper
6:30Welcome
Overview of Community Profile Process
Who is here?
6:45Mosaic and Vision
What is Mont Vernon like now?
What do we want Mont Vernon to be like in the future?
7:30Historical Overview - Bob Naber
Where has Mont Vernon been?
7:45Presentation of Community Profile components
1. Effective Community Leadership: A Broader Definition
2. Informed Citizen Participation: More Than Voter Turn-Out
3. Intergroup Relations: Celebrating Diversity Within the Community
4. Keeping Our Cultural Heritage Strong: Arts, Festivals and Celebrations
5. Education and Social Services: Meeting our Citizens' Needs
6. Community Infrastructure: The Basics that Serve Our Needs
7. Natural Resources Base: Water, Energy and Materials
8. Working Landscape: Village, Farm and Forest
9. Economic Vitality: Stability through Diversity
10. Local Business, Local Wealth: Re-Circulating Money Within the Community
8:00Small group discussions of components (Small group facilitators)
Random assignments to small groups, one component per group
  • Strengths of Mont Vernon in the component area
  • Weaknesses of Mont Vernon in the component area
  • What would you like to see in the future?
  • What are the 5 key issues that need to be addressed?
9:30Formal adjournment

Saturday

8:30Coffee and check-in
9:00Small group reports
Each of the ten small groups report to the large group, five minutes each.
9:45Selection of key issues
Discussion to refine list of 50+ keys issues down to about 10, based on consensus.
Individual selection of key issues
Participants select small group/issue to work on.
10:15Break
10:30Small groups meet for key issue discussions
Define the problem or opportunity
Project goals - identify what you want to accomplish
Identify potential projects/solutions
Evaluate potential projects using impact-feasibility grid
Select 3 projects to bring to the full group
12:15Report back from small groups
12:45Lunch and voting
Which projects do you think we should move forward on?
Which is the most important project for Mont Vernon right now?
1:45Individual selection of project development groups
Break
1:50Project development - small groups (small group facilitators)
Goals and objectives
  • Potential obstacles, solutions
  • Action steps
Resources needed
  • Principal leadership
  • Timeline
  • Coordinator, first step
3:40Where do we go from here? - full group
Action format - task forces or full body.
How to communicate with each other and the community.
Future meetings
Who should be included?
4:00Adjourn

Mont Vernon Community Profile

Friday Evening

The Mont Vernon Community Profile was conducted at Mont Vernon Village School over two days: Friday evening, April 16 and all day Saturday, April 17, 1999. About 100 participants attended on Friday, and about 60 people on Saturday. The list of attendees was slightly different each day.

The event began Friday with a spaghetti supper. Judith Bush, Extension Educator, Strengthening New Hampshire Communities Coordinator, gave us an overview of the Profile process and an introduction to the goals for the two days. A Community Profile is something like a potluck supper - a feast of ideas. Its goal is strengthening community involvement; its key idea is sustainability - balancing economic and environmental factors while thinking about the impacts of our actions for the next seven generations.

We spent a few minutes meeting each other, learning how long we had lived in town, where we work, and how we get our primary source of information. We were then asked to offer descriptions of what our town was like right now and what we would like it to be like in the future. Adjectives and phrases were called out and recorded on large easels labeled "NOW" and "FUTURE" at the front of the room. Here are the results:

The Mosaic - What is Mont Vernon like today?

Tight community
Quaint
Safe place to raise children
Wooded
Friendly
Growing
Warm community
Needs volunteers
Working dairy farm
Geographically distinct
Clean and people keep houses neat
Great community store
No malls
Genuine, not fake
No pub
No elderly housing
Fiscally conservative
Spring Gala
Great southerly view
A lot of wildlife
Rich history
No industry
Very few apartments
Lamson Farm
No stop lights
Firing/shooting range
Lots of good walking trails
Volunteer fire department
Nice waterfall
Informal groups
No public sewer
No public water.
No public kindergarten
No extreme discord
Monthly coffee house.
Outstanding police department
Large building lots
Undeveloped land
Congregational Church
Rural
Historic
Friendly
Good schools
Expensive
Diversified
Has horses
Needs library
Best PTA in state
High elevation
Kids think its boring
No 20 year olds
Still have good town meeting
Very few minorities
Dirt road
Fine historical museum downtown
Beaver Brook Museum
Little ethnic diversity
Mont Vernon Inn residential facility
No accessible public telephone or toilets.

What do we want Mont Vernon to be like in the future?

Rural
Protected water
Soccer field
Meeting place
Public transportation
Gazebo in park
Route 13 by-pass
Village sewer
Elderly housing
Pub
Clean businesses for broader tax base
Communication infrastructure
Video store
New fire truck
Sidewalks
Tighter building regulations
Reasonable taxes
Relaxed zoning regulations
Continue buffalo farm
Cheaper electricity
Community spirit
Basic business services
Larger village school
Own middle school
Stronger families
Bigger community bulletin board
Website
Starting capital reserve fund for road maintenance
Status quo
All town meetings on cable
Town forest
Nice library
Excellent school
Land preservation trust
Performing Arts Center
Jobs
Public kindergarten
Involved citizens
A café
Network of biking, walking, recreation trails
Boy scout troop
Recreation for teens
More cows
No cell towers
Cheaper electricity
Community swimming pool
Tennis courts
Skate park
Our own garden club
Babysitting network
5 acre zoning
Town paper
Riding arena
Community garden
Access to swimming lessons for kids
     

Historical Presentation

Bob Naber gave a slide show of the history of Mont Vernon.

Community Profile Ten Components

After we developed a mosaic and vision for Mont Vernon, Judith Bush introduced us to the idea of discussing Mont Vernon within the framework of 10 qualities which can be used to profile a community. These topics, drawn from the work of The National Civic League and adapted by UNH Cooperative Extension are important components of any successful community. These components make a community work well now and sustain the cultural, economic and environmental health and vitality for the long-term future.

Civic Infrastructure

1. Effective Community Leadership: A Broader Definition
2. Informed Citizen Participation: More Than Voter Turn-Out
3. Intergroup Relations: Celebrating Diversity Within the Community

Community Infrastructure

4. Keeping Our Cultural Heritage Strong: Arts, Festivals and Celebrations
5. Education and Social Services: Meeting our Citizens' Needs
6. Community Infrastructure: The Basics that Serve Our Needs

Environment

7. Natural Resources Base: Water, Energy and Materials
8. Working Landscape: Village, Farm and Forest

Economy

9. Economic Vitality: Stability through Diversity
10. Local Business, Local Wealth: Re-Circulating Money Within the Community

Next, 10 small groups of approximately 8 people each were randomly formed, one group for each of the components. The small groups adjourned to various rooms where facilitators lead the groups in their discussions and recorders made notes on more large tablets. Each group considered the definition of their component and was asked to consider the statements listed below in order to begin the discussion. Participants were asked to list the strengths of Mont Vernon as they saw them, and then to list its weaknesses. Next the groups gave some thought to the problems and issues they thought were important to the town's future. Finally, each group was asked to identify five key issues which need to be addressed in the town. These were brought back to the whole group and highlighted in five-minute summations presented by a member of each small group.

1. Effective Community Leadership: A Broader Definition

(Facilitator: John Arico; Recorder: Vicky Arico; Participants: Zoe Fimbel, Sarah Nervik, Jeanne Braen, John Koch, Karl Geisinger, Mark Murdock, Scott Foster, Bruce Cultrera. )

Statement of Purpose

The public, private and non-profit sectors must all develop leaders who can cooperate with each other in enhancing the long-term future of the community. Leadership must be responsive, honest, efficient, enlightened, fair and accountable. Leaders should be representative of their community, and should have both a grasp of the community's problems and the ability to envision an economically secure, environmentally sound and socially viable future. Leaders should be attuned to the potential to exploit opportunities and to solve problems of the community by cooperating with other neighboring communities.

Statements a community should consider:

Group Response: Community Leadership Strengths

Group Response: Community Leadership Concerns

Community Leadership: Vision for the Future

Key Issues for Now and the Future:

  1. Improve communication using new and existing technologies (website, cable channel) and also using community forums where people meet face-to-face.
  2. Increase participation.
  3. Establish a mentoring program.
  4. Preserve town meeting form of government.
  5. Manage growth/use foresight (for example, Master Plan).

2. Informed Citizen Participation: More Than Voter Turn-Out

(Facilitator: Jeff Kibbie; Recorder: Eileen Naber; Participants: Ruth Powers, Bev Geisinger, BJ Cleveland, Sue Ries, Carl Silva, Richard Asselin, Tevis Baier, Felicia Fimbel. )

Statement of Purpose

If a community is to be strong, citizens must participate through voting in local elections, serving on governmental boards, attending public hearings and being active in civic organizations. Declining ability of government to meet community needs means that philanthropy and volunteerism become even more important. All citizens need to develop knowledge and skills to contribute to community life. All sectors within a community -- private, public, and nonprofit -- must each take responsibility for the community's civic education and generate and share information with the public. Sharing in problem solving and planning for the future as a community increases pride in the community and can result in an ethic of giving and sharing as a way of life.

Statements a community should consider:

Citizens have the information they need to make good decisions.

Group Response: Strengths in Citizen Participation

Group Response: Concerns about Citizen Participation

Citizen Participation: Vision for the Future

Key Issues for Now and the Future:

  1. Communicating information.
  2. Volunteerism.
  3. Look at structure of town government.
  4. Additional public forum.
  5. Get community involved and finish master plan.

3. Intergroup Relations: Celebrating Diversity Within the Community

(Facilitator: Sally Hogan; Recorder: Penny Turner; Participants: Tom McKinney, Norma McKinney, Sharron Wilkins, Paul Fimbal, John Broeffle, Jane Flythe, Maria Erb, Steve LaBonte, Art Kubick, John Vinsel, Elizabeth Jones. )

Statement of Purpose

A community is made up of different people with different interests, experiences and backgrounds. These characteristics may divide a community into natural groups but there must be cooperation among them if the community is to work well. Increasing social complexity presents challenges to reaching consensus or resolving conflicts but also provides opportunities for cultural enrichment. As disagreements arise, neutral forums and processes are needed where all opinions can be heard and consensus encouraged. In addition, programs are needed to increase communication and understanding of different perspectives among groups and within the community as a whole.

Statements a community should consider:

Group Response: Strengths in Intergroup Relations

Group Response: Concerns about Intergroup Relations

Intergroup Relations: Vision for the Future

Key Issues for Now and the Future:

  1. Need good communication within the town
  2. Need expanded library/community center for all ages
  3. A small business area/light industry to reduce property taxes in a commercial area.
  4. Things for teens/kids to do in town, i.e.
  5. Elderly housing needed, i.e.
  6. maintain independence
  7. need for access to transportation
  8. need store the size of Harwood’s in Wilton
  9. special tax consideration

4. Keeping Our Cultural Heritage Strong: Arts, Festivals and Celebrations

(Facilitator: Lynn Wahle; Recorder: Kevin Wilkins; Participants: Bob Naber, Bob Granfors, Stephen Wilkins, Patricia Wilkins, Meg Johnson, John Quinlan, Lucien Soucy. )

Statement of Purpose

The cultural life of a community can be a strong source of pride for citizens. Arts, theater, local festivals and celebrations all reflect and build a community's positive sense of itself and strengthen the fabric of all social interactions within the community.

Statements a community should consider:

Group Response: Strengths in Cultural Areas

Group Response: Concerns about Cultural Areas

Cultural Areas: Vision for the Future

Key Issues for Now and the Future:

  1. Interview and preserve historical memories of older residents.
  2. Preserve, teach and display historical and cultural assets and heritage.
  3. Expand current celebrations to include cultural heritage.
  4. Build a greater sense of pride and community.
  5. Honor and promote artistic and cultural talents within the community.

5. Education and Social Services: Meeting our Citizens' Needs

(Facilitator: Barry Ehrlich; Recorder: Debbie Shipman; Participants: Mick Konrad, Beth Ryder, Tim Mortimer, David Landrum, Charlie Ingham, Colleen Bird, Alyson Landrum, Sue Granfors.)

Statement of Purpose

All citizens have a need for food, clothing, shelter, and for the education of their children. Although some needs are met by local, state, and federal programs, caring communities still keep a neighborly eye on fellow citizens. Things like pre-school programs, youth services, low-income housing, after-school extracurricular youth programs, and preventive health and substance abuse programs help to strengthen the social foundations of a community.

Statements a community should consider:

Group Response: Strengths in Education and Social Services

Group Response: Concerns about Education and Social Services

Education and Social Services: Vision for the Future

Key Issues for Now and the Future:

  1. Better recreation facilities.
  2. Better long-term planning for future education needs (school facilities, programs, funding, recruiting and retaining good teachers).
  3. Need to develop a system for sharing information about needs and resources among citizens.
  4. Library improvement.
  5. Identifying and addressing needs of elderly.

6. Community Infrastructure: The Basics that Serve Our Needs

(Facilitator: Tom Wahle; Recorder: Meribeth Ratzel; Participants: Jeanette Vinton, Dru Vinton, Bob Wilkins, Kevin Pomeroy, Anne Dodd, Ken Fitzpatrick, John Benjamin, Penny Schmitt, Jim Bird.)

Statement of Purpose

Public buildings, schools, sidewalks, sewers, roads, and the public water support -- are basic to the existence of a community. They absorb most tax dollars and sharply influence the community's quality of life.

Statements a community should consider:

Group Response: Strengths in Infrastructure

Group Response: Concerns about Infrastructure

Infrastructure: Vision for the Future

Key Issues for Now and the Future:

  1. Evaluate and support capital improvements; and safety/maintenance/accessibility for public buildings.
  2. Zoning for light industrial park - basic services (e.g. diner, pub, bakery) - affordable housing.
  3. Communication - links between boards and with public/town to town.
  4. Preserve, identify and expand conservation/recreation plans.
  5. MASTER PLAN.

7. Natural Resources Base: Water, Energy and Materials

(Facilitator: Betsy Hahn; Recorder: Julia Steed Mawson; Participants: Jay Wilson, Jeff Johnson, Bob Schmitt, Al Ryder, Debbie Nervik, Sally Benjamin, Fred Roderic.)

Statement of Purpose

Natural resources are materials from nature that maintain and enhance a community. This includes food, fuel, and materials used in everyday life. A sustainable community attempts to balance the rate at which renewable resources are consumed with the rate at which they are renewed. Dependence upon nonrenewable resources is minimized as much as is feasible. A sustainable community also attempts to reduce the amount of waste and emissions produced by increasing energy efficiency, and tries to minimize the effect of wastes that are created

Statements a community should consider:

Group Response: Strengths in the Natural Resource Base

Group Response: Concerns about the Natural Resource Base

The Natural Resource Base: Vision for the Future

Key Issues for Now and the Future:

  1. Need better communication and education of all people concerning town and natural resources (e.g website).
  2. Need to think about new/updated master plan.
  3. Need a process/action plan to acquire/protect resources.
  4. Need carefully thought out plan and philosophy concerning addition of low impact industry, but be in balance with natural resources.
  5. Need to engage new people in the town and its issues e.g. name tags at town events.

8. Working Landscape: Village, Farm and Forest

(Facilitator: Rodney Dwyer; Recorder: Jonathon Nute; Participants: Sean Mamone, Judy Brophy, Donald Nathan, Lois Boericke, Bill Estey, Jane King, Earle Rich.)

Statement of Purpose

The natural assets of a community consist of places of natural beauty that contribute significantly to the quality of the residents. Streams, rivers, walking trails, working farms, clean air, pastures and open land help determine a community's personality. They contribute to the everyday pleasures of a community life. A sustainable community practices effective management of natural assets so as not to undermine their existence or ability to function over time.

Statements a community should consider:

Group Response: Strengths in Working Landscapes

Group Response: Concerns about Working Landscapes

Working Landscapes: Vision for the Future

Key Issues for Now and the Future:

  1. Master Plan.
  2. Change coming quickly - newcomers are influence in town.
  3. Capital funding for land conservation.
  4. Dissemination of natural resource information/attributes to residents.
  5. Maintain and expand protected properties.

9. Economic Vitality: Stability through Diversity

(Facilitator: John Walsh; Recorder: Dawn Lyon; Participants: Tony Immorlica, Dale Miller, Jan Silva, Ed Hutchinson, Janice Quinn, Carolyn Dorr-Rich.)

Statement of Purpose

The need to maintain flourishing workplaces is of great importance to communities. A sustainable community includes a variety of businesses, industries, and institutions which are environmentally sound, financially viable, provide reasonable wages and benefits to workers, and provides those workers with opportunities to develop their skills through training, education, and other forms of assistance to prepare for the community's future needs. Government, businesses and public service organizations are all important in attracting new investment and in developing new businesses that suit the character of the community.

Statements a community should consider:

Group Response: Strengths in Economic Vitality

Group Response: Concerns about Economic Vitality

Economic Vitality: Vision for the Future

Key Issues for Now and the Future:

  1. We need to find a "unique niche" that maintains the town character.
  2. We want to encourage low impact (on the environment) business and service through review of current zoning.
  3. Developing the potential of the tracking station.
  4. Encourage local artists/crafters by providing marketing opportunities.
  5. A social gathering place (i.e. a coffee shop).

10. Local Business, Local Wealth: Re-Circulating Money Within the Community

(Facilitator: Tim Allen; Recorder: Ellen Snyder; Participants: John Rizzi, Robert Kent, Ann Hutchinson, Annette Immorlica, Linda Foster, Roberta Wilkins.)

Statement of Purpose

Local control of businesses is important to the economic health of a community. The more often money circulates within the community before leaving, the more the community benefits. Locally controlled businesses allow employees to have a voice in the decisions that affect them.

Statements a community should consider:

Group Response: Strengths in Local Business

Group Response: Concerns about Local Business

Local Business: Vision for the Future

Key Issues for Now and the Future:

  1. Examine what kinds of businesses we want in Mont Vernon - what, where, why, how to attract.
  2. Consider regional issues: sewer and water, transportation, services.
  3. Retain and expand agricultural and other land-based businesses.
  4. Encourage tourism-based businesses - integrated trail network, bed and breakfast, spa, coffee shop, Purgatory Falls.
  5. Explore development of small private school or college.

Saturday Morning

Everyone reassembled bright and early Saturday morning in the Mont Vernon Village School where we were greeted by hot coffee, muffins and breads. There were a few folks there who had not been present Friday evening and they soon felt the enthusiasm of the rest of the group. Similarly, a few members of the Friday night small groups were missing. However, most of the people were stalwarts who had signed on for both days.

The 10 easels from the small groups of the night before were arrayed across the front of the room, each bearing a list of the five key issues for that topic area. Our working day began with short presentations from a member of the each of the groups, explaining their group's list. Judith then presented us with her version of a condensed list of overarching issues which she felt had come up repeatedly in various ways in the small group lists. The entire group worked together to evaluate and refine this list. After some discussion, six key issues emerged as important to study for the future of Mont Vernon:

Key Issues

  1. Communication
  2. Community Culture
  3. Conservation and Recreation
  4. Capital Improvements
  5. Master Plan
  6. Commercial Creativity

PROJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION

After a short mid-morning break, participants each chose which of the eight key issues they would like to discuss further and broke into small groups accordingly. Each topic attracted enough people to form a small working group.

The task of each group was to think about problems that existed in each area and then to brainstorm possible solutions/answers to the issue identified. We did that by thinking out loud for half an hour or so about "problems" and "goals." Then we suggested solutions, from practical to fanciful to idealistic. The next step was to evaluate the reality of each possible solution/project using the following impact/feasibility grid.

      HIGH IMPACT:
How much will it matter?
      MODERATE
      LOW
HIGH MODERATE LOW
FEASIBILITY: How possible is it in our community?

We copied this grid onto a piece of large easel paper and each of our proposed solutions onto sticky notes. For each solution, the group decided together what the feasibility and impact of the solution would be. Then we placed the sticky note in the appropriate box.

Based on the grid, each group chose three solutions and wrote them up as proposals on their easel to be presented to the large group. Some groups chose only proposals with high impact/feasibility ratings, while others chose projects from a variety of ratings. Small projects which were highly feasible, but of low impact, were favored by those who wanted to start small and accomplish something quickly. Long term, difficult projects had advocates who were willing to commit to longer struggles with high rewards. Many of the groups proposed a combination of proposals. Verbatim notes from each of the groups are presented below.

1. Communication

(Facilitator: Jeff Kibbie; Recorder: Eileen Naber; Participants: Colleen Bird, Fred Boericke, John Benjamin, Judy Brophy, Jeanne Braen, Al Ryder, Anne Dodd, Park Walker, Dawn Lyon, Jane King, Bruce Cultrera. )

Clarification of the problem/issue to be addressed

Possible Solutions

Project Evaluations

High Impact/High Feasibility

High Impact/Low Feasibility

High/Moderate Impact/Moderate Feasibility

Moderate Impact/High Feasibility

Low Impact/High Feasibility

2. Community Culture

(Facilitator: Art Kubick; Recorder: Deb Shipman; Participants: Barry Ehrlich, Jan Silva, Alyson Landrum, Zoe Fimbel, Scott Foster, Sue Granfors, Meribeth Ratzel, Charles Buckley.)

Clarification of the problem/issue to be addressed

Possible Solutions

Project Evaluations

High Impact/High Feasibility

High Impact/Moderate Feasibility

High Impact/Low Feasibility

Moderate Impact/Moderate Feasibility

Conservation and Recreation

(Facilitator: Rodney Dwyer; Recorder: Peter Pohl; Participants: Dale Miller, BJ Cleveland, Tevis Baier, Felicia Fimbel, Jane Flythe, Jim Bird, Dru Vinton, Cheryl Foley, Rob Foley.)

Define/Possible Solutions

Project Evaluations

High Impact/High Feasibility

High Impact/Moderate Feasibility

High Impact/Low Feasibility

High/Moderate Impact/High Feasibility

High/Moderate Impact/Moderate Feasibility

Moderate Impact/Moderate Feasibility

Capital Improvements

(Facilitator: Kevin Wilkins; Recorder: Betsy Hahn; Participants: Paul Fimbel, Jon Broeffle, Sean Mamone, Ed Hutchinson, Linda Foster, Janice Quinn, John Koch.)

Possible Solutions

Library

Highway Department/Fire

Capital Improvement Plan

Project Evaluations

High Impact/High Feasibility

High Impact/Moderate Feasibility

Moderate Impact/High Feasibility

Moderate Impact/Moderate Feasibility

Moderate Impact/Low Feasibility

Master Plan

(Facilitator: John Arico; Recorder: Vicky Arico; Participants: Donald Nathan, Ken Fitzpatrick, Roberta Wilkins, Bob Naber, Sally Hogan, Bob Schmitt, Dick Asselin.)

Clarification of the problem/issue to be addressed

  • Control patterns of growth.
  • We need a vision of what the town should be:
    • consider elderly housing, where should it go etc?
    • consider impact of changing technology (cable, phone systems).
    • consider character and location of businesses.

  • Last Master Plan (1988) is outdated and vague.
  • Existing Master Plan has goals but not specific action plan.
  • We need an updated Master Plan which will include a vision of what the town should be and specific action plan to get there.

 

Possible Solutions

  • Review zoning ordinances.
  • Get as many representatives from as many groups as possible (elderly, young, newcomers, etc.).
  • Include people with commercial interests as well as existing groups.
  • Form "future shock" group to envision town in 20 years.
  • Plan for future schools.
  • Better communication.
  • Door-to-door communication.
  • Determine the end result of having a Master Plan. (Master Plan must be approved at town meeting).
  • Provide food.
  • Get people who ran Profile to run a similar event to kick-off Master Plan.
  • Master Plan kick-off dinner.

Project Evaluations

High Impact/High Feasibility

    • Master Plan kick-off dinner
    • Determine the end result of having a master plan.
    • Get people who ran Profile to run a similar event to kick-off Master Plan.
    • Include people with commercial interests as well as existing groups.

High Impact/Moderate Feasibility

    • Better communication.
    • Review zoning ordinances.

High/Moderate Impact/High Feasibility

    • Form "future shock" group to envision town in 20 years.

High/Moderate Impact/Moderate Feasibility

    • Involve as many groups as possible in process.

Low Impact/High Feasibility

    • Plan for future schools.

Low Impact/Low Feasibility

    • Door to door communication.

Commercial Creativity

(Facilitator: Tom Wahle; Recorder: Ellen Snyder; Participants: Elizabeth Jones, Shari Harcovitz Porter, Steve Wilkins, Carl Silva, Sally Benjamin, Mark Murdock, Darlene Farnsworth, Jeff Johnson.)

Clarification of the problem/issue to be addressed

  • Need to study and history of commercial businesses in Mont Vernon.
  • Ways to increase tax base without ruining rural character.
  • Maintain central downtown "commercial" center.
  • What’s our definition of "commercial."
  • Inn, General Store...we have businesses.
  • Encourage cottage industries without harming character of town. Explore types of commercial businesses that resident want.
  • Examine tax rate issues related to business development.
  • How can we promote/encourage the businesses we want?
  • Harkey’s Farm - potential for cottage industry, coffee shop in keeping with character.
  • Integrate tasteful commercial/businesses into town center. A mix of residential with some businesses.
  • Current infrastructure may not be suitable for businesses. This may actually help the town limit the types of businesses that come to town (sewer, water, transportation networks). Some see this as a benefit.

Possible Solutions

  • Map out potential of existing areas for businesses in town.
  • Best spot for a coffee shop - old spot of Archie’s Garage.
  • Develop a professional park/"light" commerce, e.g. lawyers, doctors, other services, antique shops.
  • Bed and breakfast.
  • Campground.
  • Tracking Station opportunities (issues: potential future options; still an active station).
  • Explore businesses that people want that doesn’t change the character.
  • Bakery.
  • Need to provide services (restaurants, etc.) to tourists.
  • Consider zoning changes to allow in-home businesses such as bakery, bagel shop.
  • What kind of resources (amount of land, zoning) do these businesses need.
  • Survey town residents on what types of businesses they want.
  • Need to plan to avoid strip development.
  • Evaluate traffic patterns, road systems. Help determine where a coffee shop should go.
  • Make a list of specific potential businesses.
  • Evaluate the feasibility of the businesses - needs of business.
  • Survey town residents as to what businesses they want, where we want them.
  • Need some economic incentives to encourage the businesses suitable to town, particularly in-home businesses.
  • Look at zoning to see how it affects business development. Currently need special use exemption. Evaluate whether process is too burdensome.
  • Establish a local business organization to help businesses that want to locate here.
  • Consider Amway type businesses. Buy and sell locally.
  • Develop a business directory.
  • Examine opportunities for farms and other land-based business.
  • Need certification programs for some farm products (e.g. premium black Angus).
  • More support of locally produced farm products Local and regional cooperatives.
  • Promote local agriculture including farmers market.
  • Conduct a traffic study. Talk with Nashua Regional Planning Commission.
  • Promote "farm vacations."

Project Evaluations

High Impact/High Feasibility

    • Local business expo - to show people that you can have business without it being "outrageous" and affecting others.
    • Develop a business directory.
    • Promote local and home businesses.

    • More support of locally produced farm products. Local and regional cooperatives.
    • Promote existing local businesses. A business expo host it. The role of business in the community.
    • Establish a local business organization to help businesses that want to locate here.
    • Establish a local business organization - a voice for local business; develop a business directory, promote local business.

High Impact/Moderate Feasibility

    • Examine opportunities for farms and other land-based business.
    • Make a list of specific potential businesses.
    • Survey town residents as to what business they want . Where we want them.
    • Conduct a traffic study. Talk with Regional Planning Commission - Public Works Director.
    • Look at zoning to see how it affects business development. Currently need special use exemption. Evaluate whether process is too burdensome.
    • Need some economic incentives to encourage the business suitable to town.
    • Business Feasibility Committee.
    • Put together a tourist attractions brochure.
    • Evaluate and promote Mont Vernon as a tourism destination.
    • Promote farm vacations.
    • Evaluate the feasibility of the businesses and needs of business.

Moderate Impact/Moderate Feasibility

    • Need certification programs for some farm products (e.g. premium black Angus).

Low Impact/Low Feasibility

    • Promote local agriculture, including farmer’s market.

Saturday Afternoon

PROJECT SELECTION

We returned to the large group after lunch break. A member of each small group presented the projects that the group had come up with Judith Bush led a short discussion about whether some projects overlapped and could be combined with other closely related ones. In the list of projects below, the ones which were combined or dropped from consideration are enclosed in brackets. [.....]

Every participant received five adhesive dots to use to "vote" on projects they thought were important for Mont Vernon to work on right away. Each voter could place as many dots as they wished by any project, distributing their five votes as they pleased. The projects receiving the most votes would then be discussed in small groups. The list of project ideas follows. The number of votes each received is also noted.

  1. Communication
    1. Web site. 32 votes
    2. Sign Board (seen from car). 19 votes
    3. Periodic public form. 19 votes
  2. Community Culture
    1. Create local meeting place to promote and provide local products (art, produce, woodworking, writing, etc. 2 votes
    2. Institute a community mentoring program. 5 votes
    3. Incorporate newcomers into community:
      • Welcome Wagon
      • audio walks
      • video projects
    4. making use of Historical Society. 16 votes
  3. Conservation and Recreation
    1. Inventory and mapping critical resources for protection; explore and secure funding sources. 30 votes
    2. Communicate via town column news articles, town bulletin board on important land use and protection issues. 10 votes
    3. [Recreational opportunities for youth and adults to include scouts, 4-H, soccer, baseball facilities; "Community Center." Vote 4 - 3]
  4. Capital Improvements
    1. Develop a Capital Improvement Plan:
      • committee
      • examine "model"plan
      • specific completed plans for similar size, etc. towns
      • correlate to Master Plan. 19 votes
    2. Continue pursuit of Library expansion:
      • support existing committee
      • continue all aspects of community awareness re: Darland Trust, restrictions of site, funding issues
      • site alternatives. 14 votes
    3. Recreation field:
      • improve McCollom field
      • alternative sites throughout town limits - feasibility study. 32 votes
  5. Master Plan (all projects considered as one for voting purposes)
    1. Master Plan kick-off event from which a committee will be formed
    2. Communicate the need for a Master Plan (website, newspaper, newsletter).
    3. Recruit a sufficiently large Master Plan committee from as many groups in town as possible. 39 votes
  6. Commercial Creativity
    1. Establish a local business organization:
      • a voice for local business
      • develop a business directory
      • promote local business. 11 votes
    2. Establish a Business Feasibility Committee:
      • survey residents
      • study business feasibility and needs
      • evaluate zoning and potential economic incentives
      • balance rural character with future growth
      • study tourism potential. 35 votes
    3. Promote and educate residents about local businesses and their role in the community. Host a business expo. 2 votes

ACTION STEPS

After the voting, the group decided to focus in on the top 5 projects. These were:

  1. Master Plan
  2. Economic Development
  3. Recreational Field
  4. Inventory and Mapping Natural Resources
  5. Communication

Participants once again self-selected themselves into small groups according to the project that interested them most. Each group was asked to define the following:

  • Goals and objectives
  • Existing initiatives
  • Potential obstacles and solutions
  • Leadership
  • Resources needed
  • Action steps
  • Timeline
  • First step

Some of the groups used these steps as a way to focus their discussions and notes, while others did not. Hence, the reports that follow are in a number of different formats:

  1. Master Plan

  2. (Facilitator: John Arico; Recorder: Vicky Arico; Participants: Donald Nathan, Sean Mamone, Jay Wilson, John Benjamin, Bob Naber, Sally Benjamin, Roberta Wilkins, Alyson Landrum, Darlene Farnsworth, Bob Schmitt, Jeff Johnson.)

    Goals and Objectives

    • Establish a Master Plan steering committee.
    • Establish guidelines - use RAS as a resource.
    • Establish a time line/time limit so there are goals and an endpoint.
    • Establish communication and recruiting plan.
    • Consult previous Master Plan committee.
    • Identify town’s goals.
    • Develop/complete Master Plan.
    • Establish maintenance process for future Master Plans.
    • Capital Improvement Plan.
    • Master Plan committee should be ongoing/meeting quarterly/annually.
    • Identify which representatives from town should be on the Master Plan committee.
    • Determine legal and structural framework of the Master Plan.

    Existing Initiatives

    • Last year committee existed.
    • Library expansion committee.
    • Highway department: capital improvement funds; also, school building committee.
    • Fire department apparatus.
    • Library building.
    • Highway department building.
    • Highway department equipment.
    • Cemetery trustees.
    • Recreation.
    • Conservation.
    • School Board.

    Potential Obstacles/Solutions

    • Water.
    • Sewer.
    • People’s apathy.
    • Conflicting interests.
    • Communication (with entire town).
    • Diversity - we need good diversity of interests - large enough group.
    • Support, direction and structure town government (communication will be important).
    • Community Profile buy-in from town government.
    • Selectmen should be involved in and present at kick-off.
    • Too large a group may not reach consensus (last year’s group was only 5 people).
    • Establish a chair, leadership, structure and rules, and leaders of phases.

    Resources

    • Map of town-owned land.
    • Planning Board.
    • Zoning Board.
    • Other town’s Master Plans.
    • Mont Vernon’s existing Master Plan.
    • Nashua Regional Planning Commission.
    • State Planning.

    Leadership

    • Members of last year’s committee.
    • Committee and department heads from town (15-20 different groups exist).
    • How will decisions be made?
    • Nashua Regional Planning Commission representative.
    • Consult other towns that have done one (Amherst).
    • At least one citizen.
    • All of us (Community Profile Master Plan Small Group).

    Action Steps

    • VOLUNTEERS! - recruit (website, newspaper, newsletter).
    • Steering Committee:
      • establish responsibilities, structure and guidelines for them to follow.
    • Steering Committee recruit Master Plan committee.
    • Steering Committee establish different areas that the Master Plan will cover (before Master Plan committee is formed).
    • Steering Committee exists to kick-off Master Plan, then its gone (short-term).
    • Establish Steering Committee size (maybe 5-10).
    • Communicate NEED for Master Plan.
    • Determine responsibilities of Steering Committee and Master Plan Committee.
    • Analyze Master Plan into areas.
    • Assign people to areas.
    • Discuss with Planning Board guidelines for Master Plan development.
    • Find a good leader for Master Plan Committee (does Planning Board appoint the person?).
    • Planning Board meetings April 27 and also May 11 (Tuesday) - Steering Committee could attend:
      • decisions must be made in a public meeting.
      • set up special meeting with Planning Board?
      • on April 27 existing Steering Committee gets Planning Board’s approval.
      • between April 27 and May 11 recruit others for Steering Committee.
    • Set goal for finished Master Plan date - ask Planning Board when it is needed.

    Timeline

    • May 11 - Steering Committee attends Planning Board meeting - Bob Schmitt will attend.
    • May 11 onwards - Steering Committee establishes timeline for recruiting Master Plan committee.
    • May 11 through June 8 - get their input and suggestions, recruit Steering Committee members, establish what Committee needs to do.
    • June 8 - Another Planning Board meeting - Steering Committee, work discussion.
    • September (possibly) - Master Plan kick-off event.
    • Saturday May 22 - Bob Schmitt will convene, call people to attend and will assign people to collect resources to bring.

    First Meeting

    • Saturday, May 22
    • Firehouse or school
    • Convener, Bob Schmitt, 673-8014

  3. Economic Development

  4. (Facilitator: Art Kubick; Recorder: Debbie Shipman; Participants: Carl Silva, Mark Murdock, Steve Wilkins, Meribeth Ratzel, Sue Granfors, Dale Miller, Mike Fimbel, BJ Cleveland, Jim Bird.)

    Goals

    • Survey residents.
    • Study business feasibility and needs.
    • Evaluate zoning and potential economic incentives.
    • Balance rural character with future growth.
    • Study tourism potential.

    Existing Initiatives

    • Partial Master Plan.
    • Perception that business will relieve tax base.
    • Home business by special exception.
    • Commercial zone at bottom of hill.

    Potential Obstacles

    • All businesses are bad.
    • Misconceptions on how business will affect town - traffic, taxes.
    • Zoning is not business-friendly.
    • NIMBI (not in my backyard).

    Potential Solutions

    • Need to educate about benefits of business.
    • Survey other towns/request Master Plans.
    • Review zoning regulations.

    Leadership

    • Existing business people.
    • Interested residents.
    • Representatives from other boards.

    Resources

    • Volunteers.
    • Donated services and funds - spaghetti dinner.
    • Review Master Plans from other towns and our own.
    • Government resources.

    Action Steps

    • Collect information - other towns, Nashua Regional Planning Commission.
    • Organize a committee - identify specific people.
    • Inventory current businesses/directory.
    • Develop a survey.
    • Coordinate with Master Plan committee.

    Timeline

    • Committee - by May 1.
    • Core: Steve Wilkins (convener), Carl Silva, Mark Murdock, Meribeth Ratzel (information), Mike Fimbel.
    • Ask: Randy Herring, Buffalo and Black Angus owner, and Kevin Pomeroy, a Planning Board Member.

    First Meeting

    • Thursday, April 22
    • 7:00 p.m.
    • School Library
    • Convener - Steve Wilkins, 673-9996

  5. Recreational Field

  6. (Facilitator: Rodney Dwyer; Recorder: Peter Pohl; Participants: Barry Ehrlich, Jeanette Vinton, Dawn Lyon, Felicia Fimbel, David Brook, Cheryl Foley, Rob Foley.)

    Current Initiatives

    • Need formal structure to care for field.
    • Need subcommittee of current recreation committee.

    Obstacles

    • Volunteers and funding.

    Alternative Sites

    • Use of McCollom building - concerns, ping pong.

    To Do List

    • Establish subcommittee to do the following.
    • Upgrade and maintain McCollom Field.
    • Construct storage facility at site.
    • Explore range of appropriate recreational opportunities at McCollom field.
    • Stage an event at Field to attract interest.
    • Explore other recreational opportunities, i.e. at Lamson Farm.
    • Booth at Spring Gala.

    Subcommittee

    • Bob and Cheryl Foley
    • Jeannette and Dru Vinton
    • Barry Ehrlich
    • Pam Fowler - contact person

    Next Step

    • Look for table at Spring Gala.
    • Contact: Pam Fowler

  7. Inventory and Mapping Natural Resources

  8. (Facilitator: Tom Wahle; Recorder: Ellen Snyder; Participants: Linda Foster, Alton Ryder, Judy Brophy, Jane Flythe, Tevis Baier.)

    Goals and Objectives

    • Need to map known resources.
    • Secure funding to protect lands of importance; network of lands.
    • Some maps exist, people don’t know how to access. Regional Planning Commission recently updated natural resource maps.
    • Don’t have a lot of trail maps.
    • Access to data/maps not accessible to everyone. Physical access to town hall, map format (hard copy vs. computer).
    • Develop trail maps.
    • What trails/lands/class 6 roads open to the public?
    • Enhance access to trails (e.g. acquire easements; landowner permission).
    • Contact private landowners who might be interested in providing trail access, before mapping trails.
    • Research how others have mapped and acquired trail access.
    • Explore funding issues; capital improvement could include land conservation dollars.
    • Identify areas most threatened by development.
    • Avoid fragmenting the landscape that’s important to maintaining habitat, species.
    • Several existing areas conserved in town - good track record.
    • Need to determine ownership of "conservation" areas.

    Existing initiatives

    • Town boards have done some inventory and mapping. Maps available but may not be accessible (e.g. Conservation Commission).
    • Other agencies/organizations have gathered pertinent data - SPNHF, Census Bureau, USFWS, Regional Planning Commission, The Nature Conservancy, Audubon.
    • Current use change tax - portion going to conservation, this is an option for towns.

    Potential Obstacles

    • Difference in economic philosophy among town residents.
    • Difference in priorities among town residents.
    • Liability concerns over tails/trail map that includes private lands.

    Potential Solutions

    • Indemnification of volunteers by town.

    Resources

    • Existing trail network.
    • University student projects (e.g. UNH Senior Projects, contact Extension)
    • Eagle Scout projects.

    Leadership

    • Conservation Commission - serve as umbrella.
    • Engage others in community - Tom Wahle, Tevis Baier, Alton Ryder (technical resource), Linda Foster (connects to statewide groups), Jeff Johnson, youth.

    Action Steps

    • Identify owners.
    • Examine liability issues.
    • Owner permission for public access; identify permissible uses.
    • Map trails.
    • Tap into local knowledge of tails (e.g. hunters).

    First Meeting

    • Wednesday, May 5
    • 7:00 p.m.
    • Village School
    • Convener - Tevis Baier, 564-9738

  9. Communication

  10. (Facilitator: Jeff Kibbie; Recorder: Eileen Naber; Participants: Sally Hogan, Zoe Fimbel, Jan Silva, Dru Vinton, Kevin Wilkins, Park Walker, Jeanne Braen, Colleen Bird, Jane King, Lois Boericke, Charlie Ingham, Scott Foster.)

    Goals and Objectives

    • Publish meeting dates.
    • Develop list of community organizations, key members (database).
    • Give to everyone! Hi-tech and low-tech.
    • Maintenance: network, individual, town crier.
    • Location booth-kiosk.
    • Technology update.
    • If $ not needed - GO!

    Now

    • Haphazard news coverage - broadcast by email; set up email directory.
    • Newsletters/varied outlets: church, library, PTA/school, historical society - post at Post Office, Town Hall, school.
    • Town signage is confusing - signboard and kiosk at Town Hall; meeting dates listed, agendas and minutes.
    • WWW.Tagl.com/mv
    • Post Office and general store.
    • What needs for groups - diversity of information, publications.
    • Need various information sources - kiosk, sign board, website - domain names - Park W.
    • Get builder - L. Soucy, Kendall, Banach, Schooley.

    Task Group

    • Decide what you want.
    • Where to put it.
    • Permission.
    • Builder.
    • Where to get information - meeting times and minutes
    • Identify sources:
      • Historical - Sandy Kent/M. Fimbel
      • Library - Sally Hogan
      • Church - Greg Morse
      • MVTC - M. Savage
      • PTA - Tracey Miller.
    • Include area information.
    • Signboard for events.
    • Meeting times and minutes: Planning Board, Selectmen, Recreation, Conservation, Cemetery, Purgatory Gun Club, Fire Department (K. Pomeroy), School Board, Historical Department, BSA, GSA, 4-H (Pam Fowler), Lamson Farm, Technology Committee.
    • Information to: kiosk, sign board, sandwich board for key events, website, local media.

    Action Steps

    • Identify information providers.
    • Enlist their cooperation.
    • Clearinghouse for information.
    • Identify dissemination methods.
    • People responsible for doing it.
    • Website: Park W, 672-6750 (park@tagl.com); Kevin W, 672-1598 (kevinwilkins@compuserve.com), Colleen B, 673-1188.
    • Kiosk and signboard: Zoe, 673-0733 (moxiesix@aol.com) and Dru V, 672-4595.

    First Meeting

    • Tuesday, June 15
    • 7:00 p.m.
    • Village School
    • Convener - Jane King, 672-4817

CONCLUSION

Each small group reported back their plans to the entire group. The full group discussed next steps to keep up the momentum from the Profile, with each group appointing someone to maintain contact with the Mont Vernon Profile Steering Committee.

The meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m.


Appendix A

Mont Vernon Community Profile Participants

Tim Allen
John Arico
Victoria Arico
Richard Asselin
Tevis Baier
Angela Bellamy
David Bellamy
John Benjamin
Sally Benjamin
Colleen Bird
Jim Bird
Fred Boericke
Lois Boericke
Ann Botteri
Jeanne Braen
Peter Braen
Jon Broeffle
Davis Brooks
Shelley Brooks
Judy Brophy
Charles Buckley
BJ Cleveland
Bruce Cultrera
Anne Dodd
Carolyn Dorr-Rich
Rodney Dwyer
Barry Ehrlich
Maria Erb
Bill Estey
Darlene Farnsworth
Felicia Fimbel
Michael Fimbel
Paul Fimbel
Zoe Fimbel
Ken Fitzpatrick
Jane Flythe
Cheryl Foley
Rob Foley
Linda Foster
Scott Foster
Bev Geisinger
Karl Geisinger
Bob Granfors
Sue Granfors
Betsy Hahn
Shari Harcovitz Porter
Sally Hogan
Charles Hummel
Stephanie Hummel
Ann Hutchinson
Ed Hutchinson
Annette Immorlica
Anthony Immorlica
Charlie Ingham
Jeff Johnson
Meg Johnson
Elizabeth Jones
Kate Jones
Lee Jones
Robert Kent
Jeffrey Kibbie
Jane King
John Koch
Michael Konrad
Art Kubick
Steve LaBonte
Alyson Landrum
David Landrum
Dawn Lyon
Sean Mamone
Norma McKinney
Tom McKinney
Dale Miller
Hazel Milligan
Timothy Mortimer
Mark Murdock
Eileen Naber
Robert Naber
Donald Nathan
Debbie Nervik
Sarah Nervik
Karen Paulaski
Larry Paulaski
Janine Philibot


Ron Philibot
Kevin Pomeroy
Ruth Powers
Dick Quintal
John Quinlan
Janice Quinn
Meribeth Ratzel
Carolyn Rich
Earle Rich
Sue Ries
John Rizzi
Fred Roderic
Al Ryder
Betty Ryder
Helen Saunders
Bob Schmitt
Penny Schmitt
Charlie Schulessler
Debbie Shipman
Carl Silva
Jan Silva
Lucien Soucy
Beth Spaulding
Peg Stacy
Russ Stacy
Carolyn Vinsel
John Vinsel
Dru Vinton
Jeanette Vinton
Lynn Wahle
Tom Wahle
Marina Walker
Park Walker
John Walsh
Bob Wilkins
Kevin Wilkins
Patricia Wilkins
Roberta Wilkins
Sharron Wilkins
Stephen Wilkins
Jay Wilson
Helen Witty

Mont Vernon Community Profile Facilitators
Tim Allen
John Arico
Vicky Arico
Rodney Dwyer
Barry Ehrlich
Betsy Hahn
  Sally Hogan
Jeff Kibbie
Art Kubick
Dawn Lyon
Eileen Naber
Meribeth Ratzel
  Debbie Shipman
Lynn Wahle
Tom Wahle
Park Walker
John Walsh
Kevin Wilkins

UNH Cooperative Extension Staff
Phil Auger
Judith Bush
Jolee Chase
Jon Nute
  Peter Pohl
Dan Reidy
Julie Simpson
  Ellen Snyder
Julia Steed Mawson
Penny Turner